This page is a part of the Lynn & Nahant town site.  Not for Commercial use.  All rights reserved.

Lynn in the Revolution
Chapter II.
Beginning of the Revolution -
Early Patriotic Votes of the Town
and Measures Taken

A Very Special Thanks To The Lynn Public Library For The Use Of This Important Resource.

Transcribed by Shaun Cook
To help transcribe or submit information, please e-mail Shaun Cook



     IN the autumn of 1768 the first British soldiers arrived in the town of Boston. They were sent by vote of the Par­liament of Great Britain in order that the king's rebellious subjects might be overawed. Word reached Boston in September that they were on their way, and the news was not long in travelling over the road to Lynn, for we find that almost immediately the following notification ap­peared in conspicuous places in the town: -

     "Notification For Town meeting Sept. 16th -1768

"The Inhabitants of this Town are hereby Notified, to attend 
a town meeting at the Old meeting house in sd town on Mun-
day ye 19th Instant at 3 of the Clock after noon To Se if
the Town will chuse a person or such Persons as they may
think fitt to attend a convention to be held at Boston at
Funels hall on Thursday the 22d Instant. To Consult Just
Reasonable & Proper Measures to be Taken For the Secur-
­ing the Crown and Government & also the Constitutional
Rights & Privileges of the Inhabitants which they ought to
Enjoy by Charter - By order of the Selectmen 
                          "EBENEZER BURRILL Town Cleric"

     The meeting was held in due time, with Deacon Daniel Mansfield as moderator, and chose Ebenezer Burrill by a great majority as the delegate.
     We are accustomed to the thought that all New England
[ 7 ]


was more or less excited by the intelligence of an armed force having arrived on her shores, and every school-boy has studied the history of the stirring times which followed. The names of Boston, Charlestown, Cambridge, Salem, Concord, and Lexington are inseparably linked in the thought of those times, but we look in vain for the name of "Lynn," the pleasant town lying close to the shore of the bay and in the thoroughfare between Boston and Salem, Marblehead, and Portsmouth. Certain it is that no not­able event took place within her borders, and no name of national importance can be credited to her records, yet we need nothing more than the fact of this meeting to realize that she was keenly alive to the welfare of the col­ony and stood ready to do her share in maintaining it.
     We are not able to tell specifically what was done in the little town during the seventeen months that the two obnoxious regiments were quartered in the neigh­boring town of Boston. We can only imagine that the prevailing topics of conversation by the fireside, on the farm, and in the shop were the all-absorbing ones of the acts of the British ministry, of taxation, of charter rights, of the arrogance of Governor Bernard and the toryism of Lieutenant-Governor Hutchinson. We have no further record, however, until after the Boston Massacre, when we find, under date of May 24, 1770, the following: -

     " 1. Voted we will Do our Endevor to Discountenance the use of foreign tea.
     "2. Voted no person to Sustain any office of profit that will not Comply with the above vote.
     "3ly. Voted no Taverner or Retaler Shall be Returned to Ses­sions that will not assist in Discountenancing the use of sd tea & ye Selectmen to give it as Reasons to ye Sessions.
[ 8 ]


     "4ly. Voted unanmously that we will use our Endevor to pro­mote our own manufacturing among us, 
     "Lastly voted a committee Be chose to Inspect the Conduct of all Buyers & Sellers of tea in this town and take Subscriptions - ­accordingly ye following Gentmen wee chose. Zachcus Collins, Salvenas Husey, John Mansfield, Increase Newhall & Joseph New­hall. Committee to report to ye Selectmen ye first Monday in July next."

     This interesting record is found written in the hand­writing of the town clerk, Ebenezer Burrill, but unsigned. The hated Stamp Act was indeed a thing of the past, and the two British regiments were withdrawn from Boston, yet there still remained heavy grievances against the gov­ernment. The fact that a promise had been made that there should be a repeal of all duties except that of the tax on tea was a long way from satisfying the hard­headed and far-seeing colonists, who were contending for a principle. It would seem that in the little com­munity at Lynn there must have been discussed at this time the possibility of armed resistance, for the people were looking to their arms and ammunition, voting in town meeting on the very day of the Boston Massacre that "The Town Stock of Ammunition be moved from ye meeting house. Voted ye Selectmen should have ye care of it and provide some place to Secure ye same as soon as may be."
     We wonder to-day at the short-sightedness and obsti­nacy of the British ministry during these years of contro­versy and disagreement between Englishmen on either side of the Atlantic. The inevitable result of its policy, which appears so plain to us to-day, seemed to be at that time discerned only by a Pitt or a Burke. Again and
[ 9 ]
 
again did Lord Chatham come from his retirement back to the House of Lords, and with all the strength of his great mind plead for the colonies, urging that milder measures be taken and greater wisdom and understand­ing be shown in dealing with Englishmen across the sea. It was only he and a very few others in Parliament who could comprehend the spirit which breathed in every town and hamlet in the thirteen colonies, and could say, "I rejoice that America has resisted." In spite of the debates which took place in Parliament at this time, its policy became more and more vexatious. Nearly every colony suffered in some way. The promise of the repeal of all importation tax, except that on tea, was, indeed, kept in the April following the Boston Massa­cre, yet on the last day of the spring session of the General Court of Massachusetts the following resolve passed, namely: -

     "Whereas by the act of Parliament a duty is levied upon foreign teas imported into this Province, with the express purpose of raising a revenue upon his Majesty's subjects here without their consent, upon which account the use and consumption of foreign teas is pred­judicial to the true interest of the Province, Resolved, that the mem­bers of this House will use their utmost endeavors to prevent the use and consumption thereof in the several towns to which they be­long."

     This grievance of taxation was one which affected all the colonies, and, while they were perfectly willing to aid in support of the government, they wished to con­tribute to its support, and not to be taxed by a govern­ment in which they were not represented.
     In 1772, according to Fiske, "black thunder clouds
[ 10 ]


of war gathered." On the Records of Lynn at this time the following entry was made: -

     "At a Town Meeting Leagely assembled Jany. 6th 1772, Dean. Danil Mansfield chosen Moderator, the Question being put after the papers was Red, Relating to Publick Greaveances the prvince Labours under in Regard to their Rights and Privileges,
     "Voted unanimously that this Town will concur in centiments with the towns of Boston & the Neighboring towns of the Province with regard to our Constitutional and Charter Rights and Privi­leges.
     "Voted to instruct the Representative to stand firm for our Char­ter wrights and Priviledges.
     "Voted to chuse a comittee of Seven men to corespond with comittees of other Towns Respecting the Greavences we do labour under
     "Voted Capt. John Mansfield, Majr. Abner Cheever, Deacn. Abijah Cheever, Docr. John Flagg, Dean. Nathanel Bancroft, Sal­venas Hussey & Josiah Martain. (Deacn. Danil Mansfield added in martain's rume.)"

     The choosing of this committee indicates how closely in touch were the inhabitants of Lynn with their neigh­bors in Boston, and how strong was the sympathy between them. The year 1772 marked the formation of the Com­mittees of Correspondence throughout the colonies, the work of which was to draw together by a bond never to be broken people who heretofore had understood little of one another, and had been content to know little of one another.
     When in November, 1773, the Committees of Corre­spondence from the towns of Cambridge, Brookline, Roxbury, Dorchester, and Boston met together in Fan-
[ 11 ]
 

euil Hall to discuss the landing of tea in Boston, they sent out letters to all the other towns in the colony, con­taining these words: -

     "Brethren, we are reduced to this dilemma: either to sit down quiet under this and every other burden that our enemies shall see fit to lay upon us, or to rise up and resist this and every plan laid for our destruction, as becomes wise freemen. In this extremity we earnestly request your advice."

     It was a call which brought the following response from the patriotic townsmen of Lynn: -

     "At a meeting of the Freeholders & other Inhabitants (qualified by law to vote) of the town of Lynn, Duly and Legaly assembled on the 16th day of Decr. ano Dom 1773, the following resolves were unanimously past
     "That the people on the British American colonies by their con­stitution of Government have a Right to freedom & an Exemption from Every Degree of oppression & slavery.
     "2ly That it is an Essential Right of Freemen to have the Dis­posal of their own property & not to be taxed by any power over which they have no control.
     "3ly that the parlimentary Duty Laid upon Tea Landed in America is in Effect a tax upon the americans without their Con­sent.
     "4ly That the late act of parlement allowing the East India com­pany to land their Tea to America on their own account, was art­fully framed for the purpose of Enforceing & carrying into Effect the Oppressive act of Parliment Impousing a Duty upon Teas Im­ported into America & is a fresh proof of the settled and deter­mined Designs of the ministry to Deprive us of freedom & Reduce us to Slavery.
     "5ly Resolved that we highly Disaprove of the Landing & Selling
[ 12 ]


of Such Teas in America & will not suffer any Teas Subjected to a parlimentary Duty to be Landed or sold in this town & that we stand Redy to assist our Brathren at Boston or Elsewhere When­ever our aid shall be Required in Repelling all attempts to Land or Sell any Teas poisoned with a Duty.
     "And whereas the Inhabitants of the Town of Boston have regerly applyed to the persons appointed there by the East India Company to Receive and vent off their Teas Delivered them to Resign their trust but have obestanatly Repeatedly & Daringly Refused
     "6ly Resolved that those Consignees have Shown a Ready Dis­position to become the tules of a vile & corrupt ministry, Supported by a venal & Tiranical Parlement to oppress & Enslave their Native Country & come under the Same Class of infamous Creatures with the Governors, the Commissioners and their Dependents those of enemies & traitors to their Countrey, have manifested the Stubid­ity to Sacrifice Liberty to averise, & the wickedness when occasion Shall Serve to Riot on the Spoils of their Brathren & have forfeited their Right to personal protection & Security
     "7ly That a tribute of Gratitude from us to the patriotic town of Boston, for the Public Virtue which they have Shown in the oppo­sition which they have made to the ministerial plan for Deluding the americans into a compliance with the Detestable Tea act.
     "Votd that the foregoing Resolves Be Entred of the town Records & a Coppy thereof be Delivered to Comittee of Coraspondence to Be Sent to the Comitte of Corespondance at Boston."

     This meeting, recorded in the handwriting of Ebenezer Burrill, was held on the very date of the famous one in the Old South Meeting-House in Boston, which was fol­lowed by the throwing of three hundred and forty-two chests of tea into Boston Harbor.
     An account of the feeling which prevailed in Lynn at this time would not be complete without repeating the following incident which has come down to us in the
[ 13 ]
 

"Annals of Lynn," gathered by Mr. Lewis. To use his own words: -
     "
     A report having been put in circulation through the town, that Mr. James Bowler, who had a bake-house and a little shop, on Water­hill, had a quantity of tea in store, a company of women went to his house, demanded the tea, and destroyed it. This exploit was cer­tainly as great a piece of patriotism on their part, as that performed in Boston Harbor the same year, and deserves to be sung in strains­ of immortality. Slander, however, who is always busy in detract­ing from real merit, asserted that the women put on extra pockets on that memorable night, which they filled with the fragrant leaf, for their own private consumption."

     A tradition is also preserved of at least two Lynn pa­triots who figured in the famous Boston tea-party. One was Joseph Roby, son of the Rev. Joseph Roby, of the Second Parish. He was the eldest son, twenty years old at the time, and is given in the list published by Francis S. Drake as "active in the destruction of the tea." This Joseph was living, some time after the Revolution, in Prince Street, Boston, and in 1819 in Hanover, N.H. The other man, Mr. Francis Moore, though not living in Lynn at the time of the famous tea-party, came here soon after the Revolution, and spent the remainder of his long life here. The Lynn Record of August fourteenth, 1833, in a notice of his death gives a short account of the part which he took in the Revolutionary struggle, and speaks of him as one of the few daring individuals who participated in the celebrated act of throwing over the tea in Boston Harbor, giving the interesting infor­mation that he appeared on that occasion openly and without disguise, while most of. his comrades were dis-
[ 14 ]


guised as Indians. He was a baker, and in Cambridge while the army wlas stationed in that town, and supplied it with bread, selling it at a moderate price, on credit, when it was doubtful whether he would ever receive anything in return. This was particularly noteworthy from the fact that, in consequence of the occupation of Boston by the British, there was a scarcity of bread. His zeal and generous patriotism attracted the special notice of Washington, and at the time of his death, which occurred when he was ninety-three years of age, special mention was made of the fact that his life had been marked throughout by generosity and personal sacrifice.
     The Boston Port Bill was passed on the tenth of May, 1774. Governor Gage, arriving in Boston a few days later, wrote home to the Earl of Dartmouth that he found upon his arrival that a "town-meeting was holding to consider of it," and that the act had staggered the most presumptuous, adding that he did not propose to lay any­thing new before the Assembly, inasmuch as he deemed it better to give the shock they had received time to operate, doubtless believing that it would operate in subduing the rebellious subjects of the king and in caus­ing them to make good to the East India Company the loss of their tea. How mistaken he was, the sequel was to show.
     From every colony came letters of sympathy and encouragement to the Correspondence Committee of Boston, while in the neighboring towns indignation knew no bounds. Many a wagon-load of supplies was trundled over the road from Lynn, and many an anxious and indignant meeting was held in the old meeting-house to discuss the situation and to prepare for the contest
[ 15 ]
 

which seemed inevitable. The selectmen were asked to prepare a place or build a house for the town stock of ammunition, and to furnish a sufficient stock as soon as it could be obtained.
     One entry which stands out with especial dearness in the old records will illustrate the prevailing sentiment regarding the Boston Port Bill, and may well be given in this place:

     "The Freeholders & other Inhabitants of This Town are hereby Notified to attend a town meeting at the old meeting House in sd town on Tuesday, the 28th. of June, 1774, at two of the clock after­noon,
     "To Consult upon Proper measures to be Taken by the Town for the Recovery & Restoration of the Rights & Liberties of America Ravished from them by the oppression of the British Parliment and Especialy for the Relief of our Metroplas whose trade & Commerce, upon which they Solely Depend for Subsistanee is anniolated by the Rigras Execution of the Boston port Bill, the Cruelty & Injustice of which cannot but excit a just Indignation in the Breast of every American.
     "Also to see whether the town will Bear their proportionable part of the Sum of money allowed by the House of Representatives for this province to Defray the Expence of the Committee appointed by Them to meet upon a Congress of the Collonies and Determin upon a proper method for Dowing the Same.
               "By Order of the Selectmen,
                           "EBENEZER BURRILL, Town Clerk."

     A little later the accumulation of grievances resulted in a legal town meeting held on the twenty-second of August, in which the inhabitants expressed themselves in the following words: -
[ 16 ]


     "Being deeply sensible of the Dangerous State of the Liberties of this Province from the Violent attacks of the British ministry & Parliament who seem Determined in Violation of the Laws of Jus­tice and humanity to make us Subservient to their own Wicked ambitious & Mercenary views, We cannot but be Especially alarmed from the Two Last acts of parlament Whereby our Charter is in part Vacated & the Vitals of our Constitution to be Destroyed - ­tending to Establish arbitrary Government - and Secure the most atrocious offenders from the Hands of Justice, We cannot but think ourselves warranted by the Laws of Nature which are the Laws of God & by the princeples of the Constitution, (which is not to be altred or chainged without the Consent of the people) To Secure our Selves against the operation of such Oppressive measures by the Exertion of all the Powers with Which we are Invested, - And it can Never be Consistant with our Duty to Resign ourselves to Sullen Silence or Contented Slavery - and the motion made by the Town of Marble­head, that there be a meeting of the Several Towns of the County By their Respective Delegates to consult upon the present Exegences of our publick affairs therefore we Apprehend to be seasonable & that such a meeting will Probably be attended with many salutary & Happy Consequences Thereof
     "Voted that Capt. John Mansfield, Doer. John Flagg & Deac. Daniel Mansfield be Delegates for this town to attend a meeting of the County for the purposes aforsd. that may be held at Ispwich on the 6th day of Sept. next or at any other Place or on any other Day or Days as shall be thought most convenient & Suitable by the other towns of the County.
     "Voted that the Thanks of the town be given to the Patriotic town of Marblehead for the Zeal & attention which they have shewn for the support of our most Important Rights and Liberties."

     So far as we know, there was no special excitement at:­tending the appointment of the above committee, as there had been in Salem, two days earlier, when notices
[ 17 ]


were posted in the town "desiring the merchants, free­holders and other inhabitants to meet at the town house chamber ... to appoint deputies to meet at Ipswich." It appears that Governor Gage had heard that it was the desire of the Committee of Correspondence that the inhabitants of Salem should thus assemble, and, declar­ing it to be an unlawful and seditious meeting, ordered that the inhabitants be dispersed. In order to enforce his command, he further ordered troops to be in readiness. To quote from the Salem Gazette of the twenty-sixth of August, 1774: -

     "They prepared accordingly, as if for battle, left their encampment, and marched to the entrance of the town, there halted and loaded, and then about eighty advanced to within an eighth of a mile from the Town House: But before this movement of the troops was known to the inhabitants, and while the Committee were in conference with the Governor, the whole business of the meeting was transacted, being merely to choose delegates to the county meeting. After the meeting was over, news came that the troops were on the march, but they were now ordered to return to the camp."

     The convention of delegates of counties around Boston met at Ipswich, as planned, and, among other things, boldly declared that the acts of Parliament were not entitled to obedience. A month later the first Provin­cial Congress was convened at Salem, the representa­tives having been called together by the Governor for a meeting of the General Assembly. The delegates waited at the appointed time for the arrival of the Governor, but he failed to appear. They then resolved themselves into a Provincial Congress. At this Congress we find Ebene-
[ 18 ]


zer Burrill and Captain John Mansfield representing the town of Lynn.
     This first Provincial Congress of Massachusetts, organ­ized at Salem October seventh, adjourning on the eleventh to Concord, and on the fourteenth to Cambridge, contin­ued in session three weeks, and in the record of its delib­erations, in its appointment of a Committee of Safety, its provision for the assembling and support of the mili­tia, and its thorough review of the burdens under which the colonies were laboring, we see how well its members realized that they were on the eve of revolution. A Con­vention of Committees for the County of Worcester, which had been held on the twenty-first of September, had given the first suggestion for minute companies, and the Provincial Congress seems to have extended the idea, for we find it recommending that the companies of mili­tia meet and appoint officers, and, where the regiments were deemed too large, that they be divided, the field officers forming at least one-quarter of the number in the respective companies, into companies of fifty privates, who were to equip and hold themselves in readiness to march at the shortest notice from the Committee of Safety.
     Only two records have been preserved affecting the Lynn minute-men,' and these, on file in the archives at the State House, are of much interest. The language used in the second vote is a good indication of the con­tempt with which the Patriots viewed the Tories.

LYNN, Nov. 15, 1774.
     "Pursuant to an act of the Provincial Congress, for new regulating the militia, was called a meeting of the first training band in Lynn, the 2d company, 1st regiment in Essex, formerly commanded by Col.
[ 19 ]


Wm. Brown, of Salem, having chosen Maj. Abner Cheever, as Chair­man, the following votes were passed:
     Voted, David Parker as captain.
     Voted, John Batts, 1st Lieutenant.
At an adjourned meeting, Jan. 5, 1775,
     Voted, John Pool, 2d Lieutenant.
                                   BENJ. PUTNAM, Clerk."

     "Agreeably to the advice of the respectable Provincial Congress, the training band company in Lynn, north parish, being a part of the first regiment in the county of Essex, formerly commanded by William Brown, politically deceased of a pestilent and mortal dis­order, and now buried in the ignominious ruins at Boston, met on Monday, 15th inst. (Nov. 1774) and after choosing Dea. Nathaniel Bancroft for their chairman, elected Mr. Joseph Gowen, Capt., Mr. Nathaneil Sherman, 1st Lieutenant, and Mr. John Perkins, Ensign."

     After this time we find in the provincial records fre­quent mention of the minute-men. During the second session of the Congress, in December, 1774, in an ad­dress to the inhabitants of Massachusetts Bay, - a calm, dignified, carefully prepared document, - we find the following : - 
     
     "The improvement of the Militia in general in the Art Military has been therefore thought necessary, and strongly recommended by Congress. We now think that particular care should be taken by the Towns and Districts in this Colony, that each of the Minute­-Men, not already provided therewith, should be immediately equipped with an effective Firearm, Bayonet, Pouch, Knapsack, thirty rounds of Cartridges and Balls and that they be disciplined three times a week, and oftener, as opportunity may offer."

     On the fifth of January, 1775, the town of Lynn voted
[ 20 ]


that Captain John Mansfield be a delegate to the Pro­vincial Congress to be held at Cambridge, February first. It also voted to approve of the Articles of Associ­ation of the Continental Congress, and chose the follow­ing committee to carry into execution the resolves of the association: Captain John Mansfield, Dr. John Flagg, Deacon Daniel Mansfield, Benjamin Newhall, Deacon Nathaniel Bancroft, Abner Cheever, and Deacon Abijah Cheever. On the article to see if the town would raise, assist, and encourage the minute-men, agreeable to the advice of Congress, it was voted to postpone the matter until the March meeting. Lynn should here be given the credit of having participated in the first armed resist­ance to the crown. The story is that on the afternoon of Sunday, February twenty-sixth, Colonel Leslie, with three hundred men, suddenly appeared off Marblehead in a transport. He quietly landed, and took up his march for Salem, where Colonel David Mason had been at work mounting some old cannon taken from the French. The alarm went ahead of the British, however, and, when he arrived, the cannon had been taken across the North River and the draw had been raised. Colonel Leslie demanded that the bridge be swung back, but the inhabitants refused. He then tried to impress some scows which were near by, but the owners scuttled them, and they sank. It is claimed that in the melee which followed the first blood of the Revolution was shed. Parson Barnard appeared upon the scene, however, and finally succeeded in inducing Colonel Leslie to withdraw. By the time he began to retreat, reinforcements were arriving on the patriot side, the Danvers company com­ing upon the run as he turned back. The alarm had
[ 21 ]


also reached Lynnfield, where Captain Bancroft had mus­tered his men, and was hastening to Salem. Before his arrival at the North Bridge, the British had disappeared, and, as he returned home with his men, he intercepted the Reading company, which was on the way. Had a gun been fired at Salem, it might have become the Lex­ington of the Revolution. As it was, Captain Bancroft lost one man, the first to give his life in the cause of lib­erty. The following entry appears in the Lynnfield church records: -

     "March 9, 1775. Died, Joseph Newhall, by a violent seizure after a few Days Illness suppos'd to be occasioned by a cold taken when he went out upon an alarm, in the 52d year of his age."

     On the sixth of March the town of Lynn voted that -

     ­"When the minit men are Raised, Listed & aquipt they Shall have one shilling for each half Day to Encourage them to meet two half days in a week to Exercise till ye town order otherwise.
     "Voted to have three officers a captain and first and second Lieu­tenants for each company. Each captain shall have 6/ for each two half Days; First and Second Lieuts. 4/ Each for Each two half Days.
     "Voted they Be under armes three hours each half day."

     Provision was thus made for the training of men in various companies, but it is doubtful if any degree of proficiency was attained or attempted.
     Many of the letters which have been preserved in the old records give such clear utterance to the spirit and tem­per of the times that one or two quotations may be here given with the assurance that the same electric fire glow­ing in them charged the air in our small community at Lynn.
[ 22 ]

     From Thomas Cushing, of Boston, to Arthur Lee, of London: "Our people are prompt and forward in their military exercises. There never was, since we have been a people, such military spirit prevailing as at present."
     A letter from another gentleman in Boston contains this: -

     "So generally are the principles of liberty disseminated and so deeply fixed, that nothing but arms, that supreme lex of tyrants, will be able to suppress the generous ardor which now stimulates our countrymen to defend, at all hazards, the freedom handed down to them by their ancestors; nor will they be slaves without the most obstinate and bloody contest."

     This was at a time when the people of Boston were suffering greatly, not only on account of the effects of the Boston Port Bill, but also from disease which had crept into their midst. This is shown by the following ex­tract from a letter: -

     "The small-pox is lurking about in different parts of the town, and it is apprehended will spread. A pestilential fever prevails in the army, which is even more dreaded than the small-pox. How distressful is the state of Boston! Surrounded and insulted by a numerous fleet and army; shut out from trade; and deprived of all advantages of law process!"

     Meantime, both in Parliament and in Boston more decisive measures were being taken to force the colo­nists into submission. Parliament was planning to send Generals Howe, Clinton, and Burgoyne to America with six thousand troops. Governor Gage was acquainting himself more and more with conditions throughout the colony. In February he sent two men through the coun-
[ 23 ]


ties of Suffolk and Worcester, with instructions to note the condition of roads and passes, to mark distances from town to town, to report the situation of rivers, mountains, and woods, and advantageous spots to take post in, as well as what supplies could be obtained in the several townships. What wonder that the Committee of Safety and Supplies held frequent meetings, and was actively engaged in gathering arms and ammunition, and stor­ing it in places of safety, ready for use when needed!
     On the first of April the colonists knew that a large reinforcement of troops was expected in Boston, and the third Provincial Congress, then in session in Concord, perfected its "Rules for the Army," - a lengthy docu­ment, containing fifty-three articles. Before the nine­teenth of April two delegates had been sent to each of the New England colonies, carrying the following re­solve: -

     "That the present dangerous and alarming situation of our publick affairs, renders it necessary for this Colony to make preparations for their security and defence by raising and establishing an Army, and that delegates be appointed forthwith to repair to Connecticut, to Rhode Island and New Hampshire, informing them that we are contemplating upon and are determined to take effectual measures for that purpose, and for the more effectual security of the New England Colonies and the Continent, to request them to co-operate with us, by furnishing their respective quotas for general defence,"

     How quick and general was the response was shown not many days after, when from all over New England men gathered and marched on the Lexington alarm.
[ 24 ]


This site may be freely linked to but not duplicated in any fashion without my permission.

© 2006-2007 Copyright by Shaun Cook